To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: 2 groups |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:40:15 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAA8k23RbV8iTukrJUkgO07v+AAMF=PiewOzyFBJiKOqoVB=AnQ@mail.gmail.com> <D015BEAA80DA43E1B44982E5AB7C5E39@MaynePC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Clive, LF,Well, maybe this is an equitable idea. I also noticed that many of those who are not (at all) enganged in LF activity put out the loudest shouts to shut down the blacksheep reflector! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 04.06.2012 09:04, schrieb Clive Lorton: Gentlemen, I’m beginning to think there has to be a place for both groups. Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and Yahoo for technical discussion. That way daily QSO information will not be archived and design/construction projects can make full use of the search function and files section of Yahoo. Just my two pence worth…….. Clive g8poc |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE, Roger Lapthorn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Black Sheep, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Black Sheep, Henrique Pessoa |
Next by Thread: | LF: Opera BCN 1.3Watts 501.680., M0FMT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |