Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep

To: [email protected], LF Mailing List <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep
From: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:00:06 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAA8k23RbV8iTukrJUkgO07v+AAMF=PiewOzyFBJiKOqoVB=AnQ@mail.gmail.com> <D015BEAA80DA43E1B44982E5AB7C5E39@MaynePC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
Z-usanet-msgid: XID269qFDRaJ0032X21
On 6/4/2012 4:29 PM, Steve Dove wrote:
Here and now, a 'QSO' group and a 'Technical' group seem like 
a really good idea, but nobody, I mean nobody, has that kind 
of discipline - eventually a dilute mish-mash will appear on 
both.  Later attempts to shepherd(!) contributors into the 
appropriate groups will be met with ill-will, factions will 
arise etc.  Seen just this happen.
And who will enforce the separation of the topics between the two groups ?
I can stand an occasional post about rag-chewing CW QSOs on the Yahoo group,
after all the Delete key is so handy, but it would be a pity if an interesting technical
subject were discussed only on the Blacksheep reflector, which I will shortly unsubscribe.

73  Alberto  I2PHD

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>