Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Loops v Verticals

from [WE0H Mike] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Loops v Verticals
From: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:05:06 -0500
In-reply-to: <002f01c46df8$a3fcfec0$72cdfc3e@l8p8y6>
References: <002f01c46df8$a3fcfec0$72cdfc3e@l8p8y6>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Oh boy, wait until Bill reads this. Your in for a whipping Mal. Hi hi...

73's,
Mike
WE0H
WD2XGI

hamilton mal wrote:
For those that do not know. Research around Europe has shown that VERTICALS are the only antennas suitable for Transmitting on LF. Loops are fine for Receiving, little or large but the bigger the better. Who has ever heard of a LF broadcasting station using loops for TX.  
73 de G3KEV
 
 
 
 
 
 
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: : Re: TX output circuit, Ingolf Schau
Next by Date:  LF: VE7TIL 'on', Scott Tilley
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals, Stewart Bryant
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Loops v Verticals, Alexander S. Yurkov
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]