Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: Loops v Verticals

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Loops v Verticals
From: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 02:19:33 +0100
References: <002f01c46df8$a3fcfec0$72cdfc3e@l8p8y6> <005901c46e86$99e744c0$3401a8c0@JKA>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 7:23 PM
Subject: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals


>For those that do not know. Research around Europe has shown that
VERTICALS
are the only antennas suitable for Transmitting on LF. Loops are fine for
Receiving, little or large but the bigger the better. Who has ever heard
of
a LF broadcasting station using loops for TX. <

Mal,

Perhaps because no LF broadcasting stations operate from small garden back
yards with trees and no open space.

I certainly have no quarrel with research done in Europe. Please encourage
those doing it to use this forum to discuss it. Thus far, I have only seen
your discouraging comments versus positive results from U.S.
experimenters.

Who in the U.S. has worked the distance on a loop that I have covered on
normal CW using a vertical
Scarborought to Russia, you must have read about it. If you need more info
let me know.
John Andrews, W1TAG






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>