To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Loops v Verticals |
From: | "Scott Tilley, VE7TIL" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:12:36 -0700 |
In-reply-to: | <004301c46f53$26dfdaf0$3401a8c0@JKA> |
References: | <002f01c46df8$a3fcfec0$72cdfc3e@l8p8y6> <005901c46e86$99e744c0$3401a8c0@JKA> <000101c46ec1$5e3e4820$69d0fc3e@l8p8y6> <004301c46f53$26dfdaf0$3401a8c0@JKA> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1-cvs |
Seems Mal has forgotten the primary purpose behind amatuer radio 'self
learning' NOT 'self promotion.' Thankfully we have many others are willing to
share and help us new to the craft to learn and enjoy this hobby of hobbies
and contribute in a positive manner.
73 Scott Quoting John Andrews <[email protected]>: Mal, > Who in the U.S. has worked the distance on a loop that I have covered on > normal CW using a vertical > Scarborought to Russia, you must have read about it. If you need more info > let me know. No, thanks. I remember your messages about the event quite well, and you were certainly well congratulated at the time. I'm not sure where you have gotten the impression that anyone is claiming that a well constructed vertical antenna in a clear area is inferior to a loop for transmitting at LF. The vertical is certainly the best option for people with the resources to do it right. In reading your messages over the years, you have consistently discouraged radio activities in which one could not be the biggest, the best and the first. My only fear is that fellows new to the craft would take this seriously, and feel too limited by equipment, money and real estate to even try participating in LF work. But perhaps even the greenest of us can recognize bluster and self-promotion for what it is. John Andrews, W1TAG |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re: Re: Loops v Verticals, John Andrews |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: Loops v Verticals, G4gvw |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Re: Loops v Verticals, John Andrews |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Loops v Verticals, captbrian |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |