Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Loops v Verticals

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Loops v Verticals
From: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:58:49 +0100
References: <002f01c46df8$a3fcfec0$72cdfc3e@l8p8y6> <005901c46e86$99e744c0$3401a8c0@JKA> <000101c46ec1$5e3e4820$69d0fc3e@l8p8y6> <004301c46f53$26dfdaf0$3401a8c0@JKA> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Where is Scarborough and what is it's prefix?

G3GVB

----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Tilley, VE7TIL <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Loops v Verticals


Seems Mal has forgotten the primary purpose behind amatuer radio 'self
learning' NOT 'self promotion.' Thankfully we have many others are willing
to
share and help us new to the craft to learn and enjoy this hobby of
hobbies
and contribute in a positive manner.

73 Scott

Quoting John Andrews <[email protected]>:

> Mal,
>
> > Who in the U.S. has worked the distance on a loop that I have covered
on
> > normal CW using a vertical
> > Scarborought to Russia, you must have read about it. If you need more
> info
> > let me know.
>
> No, thanks. I remember your messages about the event quite well, and you
> were certainly well congratulated at the time. I'm not sure where you
have
> gotten the impression that anyone is claiming that a well constructed
> vertical antenna in a clear area is inferior to a loop for transmitting
at
> LF. The vertical is certainly the best option for people with the
resources
> to do it right.
>
> In reading your messages over the years, you have consistently
discouraged
> radio activities in which one could not be the biggest, the best and the
> first. My only fear is that fellows new to the craft would take this
> seriously, and feel too limited by equipment, money and real estate to
even
> try participating in LF work.  But perhaps even the greenest of us can
> recognize bluster and self-promotion for what it is.
>
> John Andrews, W1TAG
>
>
>
>









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>