Hi Joe What kind of authorization did you get from IC to do this? Would be nice if we could do the same so please fill us in. 73 Scott VE7TIL 73 Joe VO1NA
The Canadian proposal was based on 1W EIRP according to Jim, VE3IQ one of major driving forces behind it. i May even have an email around here somewhere explaining the issue from many years back... I
Hi All Been awhile since I've posted to the reflector. I'm pleased to announce I have escaped the noisy clutches of the City and bought myself a nice piece of land up the coast in a very quiet spot.
Hi Guys Thanks for the responses. This one has me still scratching my head. All of the LF bands are affected. I have tried my RF isolation transformer that worked rather well back in the city. I have
Hi All The mystery of 'the noise' is beginning to reveal itself. I believe it is e-field in nature and related to the proximity of mains AC wiring... After relocating the loop into the back 40 the no
Careful Klaus your using terms that our friend Mal doesn't understand and you may be approaching actually trying to rationalize with him... To him CW in any form is above the laws of Physics and only
All this is evidence of your lack of skill in the setup of your own station nothing more nothing less... YOU OBVIOUSLY HAVE NOT SEEN MY REPORTS RECENTLY. I OFTEN COPY THE USA STATIONS AUDIBLE AND LOU
Hi Jim Interesting comments and its pretty much what I experience on WSPR HF. Another factor to consider with WSPR is the soundcard sampling rate it uses 12000sps. Some have had issues with this as n
MAL wrote "..., which takes up a lot less bandwidth." Wrong, unless the little world you live in doesn't obey the laws of Physics and you really believe CW takes no BW. Most if not all viable digi mo
If you could read you would do some research at K1JT's wonderful website: http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/ Joe has laboured for many a year on similar projects and has written much about
Mal I couldn't care less about your out of date qualifications as your profession has been replaced by a black box designed by men like me... That's probably what bugs you the most and what drives yo
Newcomer? Your memory is as good as your operating practice and your ability to socialize. rather indicates he is Mal adroit ? Bob K3DJC News travels fast why has it taken so long for you to catch up
Mal WSPR was NOT designed for VHF/UHF and again if you could read you'd know that after you had read the documentation I referred you to. It was designed specifically for HF use in a high QSB environ
I assume M0BMU is on 503.5KHZ with a WSPR dial freq of 502.0 USB correct? Monitoring now... TU Scott VE7TIL CN89dk Jim Just happened by the receiving setup and noticed the following decode: 081221 23
Hi David I've used JT65 to listen to cloud backscatter as well with a small laser radar system I built. If only someone else out here had such a rig :-) 73 Scott [email protected] wrote: Interesting resu
Mal WSPR was simply designed as an automated propagation monitoring mode that was originally optimized for HF use, nothing more nothing less. It works pretty well for what it was designed to do. Unli
Hi Graham Thanks for the info, WSPR having a 3db advantage is not surprising as the sequence is twice as long, but you can't average with WSPR! I had a look at the results have the following comments
Hi David and All Although not LF related LASER DXing does share alot of common problems and solutions. Here's a couple of links to some of the developments in the LASER DX area: http://mail.rochester
Try the top end of 30m where most digi types hang out during the day. Normally the digi types don't need to occupy the entire band and congregate in small areas of BW. Oh, and listen really carefully
Hi James and All One feature that has not really been discussed is the average feature offered in JT65. It allows the user to average sync'd sequences that have not been decoded. jt65 can positively
