Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:: 496 ]

Total 496 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: 1600m Beacon QRV (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:29:19 -0700
Hi Joe What kind of authorization did you get from IC to do this? Would be nice if we could do the same so please fill us in. 73 Scott VE7TIL 73 Joe VO1NA
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00199.html (9,008 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz band - WRC07 (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:48:15 -0700
The Canadian proposal was based on 1W EIRP according to Jim, VE3IQ one of major driving forces behind it. i May even have an email around here somewhere explaining the issue from many years back... I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00487.html (10,215 bytes)

3. LF: AC Noise on RX... (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:10:53 -0700
Hi All Been awhile since I've posted to the reflector. I'm pleased to announce I have escaped the noisy clutches of the City and bought myself a nice piece of land up the coast in a very quiet spot.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-09/msg00023.html (9,546 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: AC Noise on RX... (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:16:33 -0700
Hi Guys Thanks for the responses. This one has me still scratching my head. All of the LF bands are affected. I have tried my RF isolation transformer that worked rather well back in the city. I have
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-09/msg00203.html (13,013 bytes)

5. Re: LF: AC Noise on RX... (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:04:10 -0700
Hi All The mystery of 'the noise' is beginning to reveal itself. I believe it is e-field in nature and related to the proximity of mains AC wiring... After relocating the loop into the back 40 the no
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-09/msg00287.html (11,768 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: WSPR and CW (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:22:46 -0800
Careful Klaus your using terms that our friend Mal doesn't understand and you may be approaching actually trying to rationalize with him... To him CW in any form is above the laws of Physics and only
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00087.html (11,380 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR and CW (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 11:37:23 -0800
All this is evidence of your lack of skill in the setup of your own station nothing more nothing less... YOU OBVIOUSLY HAVE NOT SEEN MY REPORTS RECENTLY. I OFTEN COPY THE USA STATIONS AUDIBLE AND LOU
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00187.html (11,572 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: WSPR and CW (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 11:35:20 -0800
Hi Jim Interesting comments and its pretty much what I experience on WSPR HF. Another factor to consider with WSPR is the soundcard sampling rate it uses 12000sps. Some have had issues with this as n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00234.html (13,706 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:18:38 -0800
MAL wrote "..., which takes up a lot less bandwidth." Wrong, unless the little world you live in doesn't obey the laws of Physics and you really believe CW takes no BW. Most if not all viable digi mo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00283.html (12,477 bytes)

10. Re: LF: wspr (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:00:33 -0800
If you could read you would do some research at K1JT's wonderful website: http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/ Joe has laboured for many a year on similar projects and has written much about
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00311.html (11,903 bytes)

11. LF: Re: Why WSPR when you can SHOUT! (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:17:54 -0800
Mal I couldn't care less about your out of date qualifications as your profession has been replaced by a black box designed by men like me... That's probably what bugs you the most and what drives yo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00431.html (22,891 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:43:57 -0800
Newcomer? Your memory is as good as your operating practice and your ability to socialize. rather indicates he is Mal adroit ? Bob K3DJC News travels fast why has it taken so long for you to catch up
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00571.html (12,047 bytes)

13. Why WSPR when you can SHOUT! was Re: LF: wspr (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:05:08 -0800
Mal WSPR was NOT designed for VHF/UHF and again if you could read you'd know that after you had read the documentation I referred you to. It was designed specifically for HF use in a high QSB environ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00597.html (17,571 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:34:48 -0800
I assume M0BMU is on 503.5KHZ with a WSPR dial freq of 502.0 USB correct? Monitoring now... TU Scott VE7TIL CN89dk Jim Just happened by the receiving setup and noticed the following decode: 081221 23
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00600.html (10,729 bytes)

15. Re: LF: Re: WE2XGR/2 in JT65A mode last night (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:31:04 -0800
Hi David I've used JT65 to listen to cloud backscatter as well with a small laser radar system I built. If only someone else out here had such a rig :-) 73 Scott wrote: Interesting resu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00644.html (9,736 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Re: Re: Why WSPR when you can SHOUT! (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:32:26 -0800
Mal WSPR was simply designed as an automated propagation monitoring mode that was originally optimized for HF use, nothing more nothing less. It works pretty well for what it was designed to do. Unli
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00703.html (24,929 bytes)

17. Re: LF: Re: WSPR and CW (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:30:00 -0800
Hi Graham Thanks for the info, WSPR having a 3db advantage is not surprising as the sequence is twice as long, but you can't average with WSPR! I had a look at the results have the following comments
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00724.html (18,334 bytes)

18. Re: LF: Re: JT65A and narrow modes (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:59:12 -0800
Hi David and All Although not LF related LASER DXing does share alot of common problems and solutions. Here's a couple of links to some of the developments in the LASER DX area: http://mail.rochester
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00423.html (10,001 bytes)

19. Re: LF: NON MORSE (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 14:08:07 -0800
Try the top end of 30m where most digi types hang out during the day. Normally the digi types don't need to occupy the entire band and congregate in small areas of BW. Oh, and listen really carefully
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00484.html (9,588 bytes)

20. Re: LF: Re: Re: WE2XGR/2 in JT65A mode last night (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:27:56 -0800
Hi James and All One feature that has not really been discussed is the average feature offered in JT65. It allows the user to average sync'd sequences that have not been decoded. jt65 can positively
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00640.html (13,591 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu