Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon
From: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:18:38 -0800
In-reply-to: <006601c96428$a8c6cc80$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
References: <000701c962f1$b79b04c0$4201a8c0@home> <016901c963c8$1c543720$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]> <004501c963cf$24a20db0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <000901c96356$9dffe3e0$4201a8c0@home> <006601c96428$a8c6cc80$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)

MAL wrote "..., which takes up a lot less bandwidth."

Wrong, unless the little world you live in doesn't obey the laws of Physics and you really believe CW takes no BW.

Most if not all viable digi modes on 600m operate in such a manner that they do not generate bandwidth wasting sidebands like even the best CW transmitters do by the simple nature of the keying. Worst case a PSK31 signal occupies 32Hz. A WSPR signal occupies 6Hz. Both modes allow for many QSOs or beacons in a small sliver of the band. I see no reason that any of these modes cannot coexist with little or no impact on each other or CW aficionados pursuing their passion.

http://fermi.la.asu.edu/w9cf/articles/click/index.html

If the above is alittle too much for your small mind try this simple rule of thumb:
/CW Bandwidth/ = wpm X 4

So assuming your bluster is true and you are the world's best CW op, your bandwidth is surly more than any digi mode currently in use on the band and you should either slow down or go QRT if you really believe your logic.

I await your further ramblings on how you've saved the world with CW and we're all lessor men for just not getting it... With luck you'll stop wasting internet bandwidth with your nonsense.

73 Scott
VE7TIL








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>