To: | [email protected], [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [english 100%] Re: LF: 2200m Trans-Atlantic QSO dream... |
From: | N1BUG <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:19:54 -0400 |
In-reply-to: | <0585B3467D174C4FB19BDE57441EF459@mal> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BF78757DDB53418FBDBB44BDDF21C052@PCDaheim> <CAC+C6w41=_5R_po9Kn0Szd7dTtv6DQ4Cgn7uWAPjRwwyoXUpfQ@mail.gmail.com> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003ABA3C3A19A@servigilant.vigilant.local> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <0585B3467D174C4FB19BDE57441EF459@mal> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
This brings us full circle to the reason for my original post. :-) The problem is lack of stations. I'm hoping someone will take the bait and build or rebuild a capable station over the summer. Currently I know of no one on the east side of the pond who has the time and is capable of working me on any of those modes. I am currently capable of working CW, QRSS, DFCW and JT9-1 with 0.5 watt EIRP, soon to be 1 watt. 73, Paul N1BUG On 03/20/2018 10:21 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Use QRSS, DFCW, or normal CW, this has worked well in the past. What seems > to be the Problem ? > It is probably easier on LF than MF. Aim for around 1W erp RF > Simplicity is the answer > > > 73 es gl de MAL/G3KEV |
Previous by Date: | LF: DP0GVN, g3kevmal |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [english 100%] Re: LF: 2200m Trans-Atlantic QSO dream..., Laurence KL7 L |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [english 100%] Re: LF: 2200m Trans-Atlantic QSO dream..., g3kevmal |
Next by Thread: | Re: [english 100%] Re: LF: 2200m Trans-Atlantic QSO dream..., Laurence KL7 L |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |