Hi Stefan,

I have WSJT-X 0.95 which has the slow JT9 modes. Unfortunately I
tested om three computers and it will not run correctly. One of them
is Windows XP, another Windows 7, and the third Windows 10. I am not
the only one who has tried this and failed to make it work.

Many of us have the same problem with WSPR-X for decoding WSPR-15.
It works for some, but not for others even on XP.

Such is life.

So far I have not found any later (eg. 1.x) version of WSJT-X which
has the slow JT9 modes.

73,
Paul N1BUG


On 03/19/2018 12:22 PM, DK7FC wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> There is an old version of WSJT-X that contains slow JT9 modes. If i 
> remember correctly there was -1 -2 -5 and -10. Maybe someone has the old 
> exe still available?
> 
> 73, Stefan
> 
> Am 19.03.2018 17:07, schrieb N1BUG:
>> One of my big dreams is to complete a two-way QSO across the
>> Atlantic on 2200m. It has been done. It can be done. My station is
>> getting close to being ready. I have heard 2E0ILY up to -12 SNR on
>> WSPR2 and I have been reported with -19 SNR by G8HUH and G0LUJ.
>>
>> It is too late for this season as QRN is always high now. But for
>> next winter I should have 3 dB more power and hopefully more/better
>> receive antennas.
>>
>> Modes are a bit of a problem. On the best nights JT9 would be easy
>> but most of the time it would probably have to be QRSS or DFCW. It's
>> too bad we don't have a very slow digital QSO mode like JT9-10 or such.
>>
>> So, who is going to take the challenge for a dream QSO next winter?
>> You have all summer to get the station ready... ;-)
>>
>> 73,
>> Paul N1BUG FN55mf
>>
>>    
> 
> 

-- 
Paul
N1BUG  160m-2m         DXCC Honor Roll
WI2XTC 2200m-630m Experimental license
FN55mf      ME      Piscataquis County
http://www.n1bug.com
http://www.aurorasentry.com