Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz
From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:54:04 -0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1479246862; bh=wWOk6Y7PrUwEv3kv06jm/ozlz4zEGzzRM+TytuWA/uM=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=LmJrD/ilg+fhsQDH0qwKXrzaMLFuhw9DYqxDpaOoAeChRHnB46Yw/MEhXR31k4QB49zHi2qhLSNOCkLGSWE8212lMWd2gopxXOlBo2mCraGgq3vwl/v0QohkgODrE86S+k2ZTkqFCJZcj4uT01utmlepteNG3WBecjA0Qy+3uMM=
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Stefan, if I can ramble a bit on this topic.......I think the situation is probably more complex than you are envisaging. I see what your objective is.....you effectively want to characterise the height of the Earth ionospher waveguide over the whole path. However you talk of QSB. Now QSB can only happen on a given route if thereare two paths of different length between the tx and rx. Thus for example take a 10000km path and think about rays rather than waveguide modes. The main mode will be about 5 ionospheric hops, but QSB will occur if there are also signals at the rx which travel by 6 hops. Their phase will be different and will also change differently as the apparent reflection height changes along the path. Another complication is that one or both paths may not be a strict great circle due to tilting of the ionospheric layer.

It may be possible using several source signals to extract parameters of the path. A UK radio amateur astronomer has done this for very short range paths using simultaneous data from Anthorn and Skelton to central England .....but not in real time, and only in daytime when the modelling is easier. Another problem could be that the apparent reflection heights calculated from 23.4kHz data may be different to those in action for frequencies below 8kHz.

It is an interesting challenge. In daytime you have the added complication of a narrower "waveguide" It may be possible to model a 1000km path (one hop), and test it on that.

Alan
G3NYK


----- Original Message ----- From: "DK7FC" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz


Hi Paul,

Many thanks for the decodes from these streams. What is the most distant location from where a stream is available?

Interestingly, the phase of my signal is less stable in Bielefeld than on your side. OK, it can be expected but now we saw it. So maybe this is an advantage of more distant locations? I remember the VLF grabber of TF3HZ, who received my kite transmission on 8.97 kHz. Maybe he will join in again and even provides a stream? The distance would be 2440 km.
Probably he is reading this, i would expect :-)

The (unknown) phase stability over a certain path and time is the question. And its reproducibility. It looks like we started something here, a thing that could become the trick how to get world wide VLF communication by amateur radio stations. You see i become a bit crazy now ;-) Edgar J. Twining is the man i'm thinking about! I know he has the skills, motivation and RX sites to be the man for the unbelivable project. Maybe he is reading this as well.

Now a next question/idea comes up to me: When observing the phase of available signals (DHO38, GBZ, JXN, ALPHAs...), can we conclude to the phase on 6.47 kHz? I mean daily! Assume we would try to transfer a message to Australia by using the currently tested technique. Then there will be 'good' and 'not so good' days. Not only different QRN levels, also phase changes may become a problem. If someone, let's say in Tasmania, would run a wideband RDF spectrogram (yes Markus, i know. I will do it soon! Now the time has come!) and can monitor the phase of DHO38 on 23.4 kHz, is this of any use for 6.47 kHz or 8.27 kHz?? At least it would be most useful to observe the VLF spectrum from there, trying to find some correlations. We need an expert there!



The linux commands and your vlf utils are a future project for me. It will be a big project i assume. But maybe its better to let me be the one on the TX side.

Am 14.11.2016 20:09, schrieb Paul Nicholson:
  11th Nov      3.9   -62.5 -141.2 8K19A   60   4   'TEST'
 12th Nov      4.9   -59.7 -134.3 8K19A   60   4   'TEST'
 11th + 12th   6.6   -58.1 -137.5 8K19A   60   4   'TEST'
 13th Nov      8.5   -55.6 -138.5 8K19A   60   4   'TEST'
 11th to 13th  8.6   -55.2 -137.8 8K19A   60   4   'TEST'
 14th          3.5   -61.3 -136.8 8K19A   60   4   'TEST'
 11th to 14th  9.9   -54.3 -137.6 8K19A   60   4   'TEST'
Thanks for the table.
What's the result of 15 th and 11th to 15 th on your side?

Its better not to mix up the day and night transmissions now. The night transmissions are a separate experiment. But if their phase is stable as well, one could correct the phase offset and use them for a decode. So we can simply avoid the time where QSB and the Terminator passes the path. To be checked...

73, Stefan





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>