Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 01:11:04 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Yes, RR. The new error map is more informative. The errors are quite equally spread i find. Starting at 7 UTC looks more promising but let's try 6 UTC now.

73, Stefan

Am 02.11.2016 22:01, schrieb Paul Nicholson:

I added the relative background noise at 6470 Hz to
the error map,

 http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/161102b.gif

Tried some further settings of blanker but no
improvement over the +1.7 dB.

> Start time: 03.11.2016   06:00:00 UTC
> Symbol length: 30 s
> Characters: 11

Should have a good chance if we have another quiet
day.  I think that 15 chars with 25 second symbols
is probably within reach (at about -0.4 dB) but
let's try 11 chars first.

The error map is useful for planning transmissions.
Even though the signal is too weak to plot its
amplitude, the error map reveals when the signal
is strong enough.

--
Paul Nicholson
--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>