Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz
From: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 13:44:39 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vfka+otOgD8ByVG+e1/5K3mh01eZtojfEaI+t5cbhWs=; b=CrHpx1G0PLjiXUW64onNplS238 etgvQCcbfHg5+qYySxzyQP5fprfAaiI1PHWYrkl9mLiWz6/nP1rwaYmAod5BABcc9c6f1tU+4V3HL 8JeHcsFf7DoMRbXplUkHbX7t9l6K+3zTHZmGJWoOVozwSkEHwCRmYdgOFtZUlK7TXhxI=;
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0

> Start time: 03.11.2016   06:00:00 UTC
> Symbol length: 30 s
> Characters: 11

No decode of this one.

> Time for a night-transmission test!

Let's try.

> Did you ever see a frequency offset or (relevant) time
> offset on my transmissions.

Frequency ok, carrier and successful decodes showed no
phase shift over long periods.  Signal too weak to check
for short period phase changes.

I haven't looked to bit clock offsets, I assume with these
long symbols that it won't be a problem.

> There are short periods in which the error density is
> very high,

Eg 13:30 to 14:30 but the noise was low.  And there are
short periods when it is completely red.  Even random
noise would only give half red.  Probably just statistics.

> It's a bit a pity that the phase varies so much between
> day and night.

No so much, 60 degrees, and I can compensate for that before
the decoder.   Day/night phase change should be less of a
problem as we go to lower frequencies.  LWPC is not much
help without a better ionosphere model than its basic
LWPM model.

--
Paul Nicholson
--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>