To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:30:27 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KUjq1VFNXtIEhCldfTnlGjTXCR+KrwfySDMAFc4GhSM=; b=IFrGhnNyYW3VhRgO2czvUValpV B8EEIXOh3cLtsYAeSaKvBt2lQrb/PsW9isdRQIUCLYK99R6oSdVfL3CfweYU0bdYIP9lH5c1Xy9aw ryTE9PNVGhItLoRBC57jWHKjuv6LHOhhEkc9YVmkTjJblJoLiAg2PkMp8cP2ZzkgC/1s=; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 |
The recent 'TEST' messages are decoding very well at Bielefeld, range 301.7km. From the online recording of Wolf's vlf6 E-field receiver Eb/N0 S/N Phase 2016-11-11 5.7 -59.4 -42.5 2016-11-12 4.3 -60.5 -36.3 2016-11-13 8.5 -55.1 -37.2 2016-11-14 6.7 -58.1 -34.1 2016-11-15 5.0 -59.8 -38.1 All with constant reference phase, and the decoder is working on a copy of the signal which has been through a stage of vorbis compression/decompression. No normalisation used. The signal processing pipeline for the above goes like vtread -T2016-11-11_08:00,+27900 /raw1/vlf6 | vtcat -p | vtfilter -ath=5,ul=6400 -h bp,f=7900,w=3000 -h bs,f=6400,w=60 | vtblank -a2.0 -d0 -t1 | vtmult -f 6470 | vtresample -r240 | vtresample -r1 | vtraw -oa | ebnaut -dp8K19A -r1 -S60 -N4 -L15000 -c4 -PS -v vtread extracts the raw signal from the 20 day loop of signal from Bielefeld stored on my VLF stream server in Germany. The vtcat -p is necessary to pad with zeros the gaps produced by occasional interrupts of the vlf6 vorbis uplink. vtfilter is applying an auto hum notch up to 6.4 kHz, band pass centered 7900 +/- 1500 and a band stop 6400 +/- 30 vtmult mixes down to baseband I/Q. Two stages of resampling because vtresample won't do a large ratio in one step. vtraw -oa converts to three column ASCII for the decoder input. Now to try Cumiana vlf15 ... -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, Paul Nicholson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |