To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Idiot's guide to receiving Ebnaut? - Tutorial part2 |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:18:23 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=mqOzROB9Er99WNSXOSYCFMNYmqLj1sYzF6g8WT7YdQc=; b=7vyYl7d8btTcnJjTR0Ggks719O 0evyrvlHLk4y7JicPtFwHaNh5q0aHL6lxty3gE4SQkAgCl3pV7l5y7Hg0XFi/w7RpXMSRmpJHFAyl TSCOEWPeKL3toFlcBSSGsLqGIV1XAIbAPLfxpClqoiQgYAf31egUxh3QXLw4qR/mzlSI=; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 |
Wolf wrote: > measured the standard deviation in the GPS sync pulse > timing. Used an E-MU 0202 at 192 kSamples/second. Ran a quick trial here. With the Trimble 10uS directly into an E-MU 0202 at 192k/sec I get 100nS std dev of the raw intervals. The timing system here uses smoothed intervals which reduces the jitter to below 30nS. Same setup at 48k/sec is useless, the raw std dev is around 6uS. Watching the pulse on vtscope, the waveform changes significantly from one pulse to the next. This is so at both sample rates but seems worse at 48k. Looks like waveshape depends on just when the pulse arrives with respect to the soundcard's internal A/D sampling. With the centroid method, we must avoid sharp edges and flat tops. Some sort of analog filtering before the card input is required. A low pass RC is usually used. I always recommend running the card at its full sample rate and down sample if required after the timing system has done its stuff. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Idiot's guide to receiving Ebnaut? - Tutorial part2, Tony Baldwin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: JT9 NOW, g3kevmal |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Idiot's guide to receiving Ebnaut? - Tutorial part2, Tony Baldwin |
Next by Thread: | GPS pulse timing (was: Re: LF: Idiot's guide to receiving Ebnaut?), Wolfgang Büscher |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |