Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: GPS pulse timing |
| From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:59:15 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hello Wolf, Am 30.10.2016 01:13, schrieb Wolfgang Büscher: Will it make a significant difference for narrow band ( < 100 uHz FFT bin width) VLF transmissions / receptions in combination with the ublox chips?I will upload a new version of SL soon, but first I will try to improve the pulse timing for lower sampling rates. 73, Stefan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Idiot's guide to receiving Ebnaut? - Tutorial part2, DK7FC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: GPS pulse timing, Wolfgang Büscher |
| Previous by Thread: | GPS pulse timing (was: Re: LF: Idiot's guide to receiving Ebnaut?), Wolfgang Büscher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: GPS pulse timing, Wolfgang Büscher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |