Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: GPS pulse timing

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: GPS pulse timing
From: Wolfgang Büscher <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 21:15:21 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
Hi Stefan,

No significant improvement if the soundcard really supports 96 kHz sampling or more, and if the standard deviation in the GPS-based pulses is already below 100 ns. That is displayed on the SR panel as 'StdDev60' (standard deviation in the recent 60 1-second pulses). But it's a nice tool to compare the performance of different GPS receivers (and soundcards).

73,
 Wolf .

Am 30.10.2016 um 20:59 schrieb DK7FC:
Hello Wolf,

Am 30.10.2016 01:13, schrieb Wolfgang Büscher:

I will upload a new version of SL soon, but first I will try to improve the pulse timing for lower sampling rates.
Will it make a significant difference for narrow band ( < 100 uHz FFT bin width) VLF transmissions / receptions in combination with the ublox chips?

73, Stefan



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>