Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: GPS pulse timing |
| From: | Wolfgang Büscher <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 30 Oct 2016 21:15:21 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
Hi Stefan,No significant improvement if the soundcard really supports 96 kHz sampling or more, and if the standard deviation in the GPS-based pulses is already below 100 ns. That is displayed on the SR panel as 'StdDev60' (standard deviation in the recent 60 1-second pulses). But it's a nice tool to compare the performance of different GPS receivers (and soundcards). 73, Wolf . Am 30.10.2016 um 20:59 schrieb DK7FC: Hello Wolf, Am 30.10.2016 01:13, schrieb Wolfgang Büscher:Will it make a significant difference for narrow band ( < 100 uHz FFT bin width) VLF transmissions / receptions in combination with the ublox chips?I will upload a new version of SL soon, but first I will try to improve the pulse timing for lower sampling rates.73, Stefan |
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: GPS pulse timing, DK7FC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: MF JT9 Activity, iz7lsz |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: GPS pulse timing, DK7FC |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: GPS pulse timing, DK7FC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |