Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: GPS pulse timing |
| From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 30 Oct 2016 21:37:06 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Wolf, Am 30.10.2016 21:15, schrieb Wolfgang Büscher: Hi Stefan,No significant improvement if the soundcard really supports 96 kHz sampling or more, and if the standard deviation in the GPS-based pulses is already below 100 ns. OK. That is displayed on the SR panel as 'StdDev60' (standard deviation in the recent 60 1-second pulses). I know :-)See the capture attached. This is the VLF stream from the tree. Could it have to do with the vorbis stream? Or is it due to the module? The module receives 7 satellites at the moment? 73, Stefan
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: GPS pulse timing, Wolfgang Büscher |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: GPS pulse timing, Wolfgang Büscher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: GPS pulse timing, Wolfgang Büscher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
