Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Idiot's guide to receiving Ebnaut? - Tutorial part2 |
| From: | Wolfgang Büscher <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:46:28 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
Hello Jim,I wouldn't give up on the Thunderbolt E yet. A double-ovenned 10 MHz sounds intriguing, you should have a very low phase noise which other GPSes (clocked by a cheap 'computer grade' oscillator) cannot achieve. It will be interesting if you use the Thunderbolt to trigger a digital oscilloscope, and measure the PPS signal from the chinese unit at a resolution of a 10 ns or so. With a simple pulse-shaping network (CMOS 4093 wired as a crude 10 us monoflop), the pulse digitized with an E-MU0202 look good enough to be used as a timebase with SL. I will play with a modified algorithm, and see how it compares with the edge-interpolation on the 100 ms pulse from the Garmin - also at lower sampling rates (with sampling intervals longer than 10 us). Cheers, Wolf . |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 477.7 kHz CW, Roelof Bakker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: LF: IW4DXW EARTHQUKE during qso, riccardozoli |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Idiot's guide to receiving Ebnaut? - Tutorial part2, Wolfgang Büscher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Idiot's guide to receiving Ebnaut? - Tutorial part2, DK7FC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |