Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: MiniWhip antenna, fiber optic /p tests

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Re: MiniWhip antenna, fiber optic /p tests
From: Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:37:37 +0200
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Delivered-to: daveyxm@virginmedia.com
In-reply-to: <001c01ce80a7$03d1add0$0b750970$@nifty.com>
References: <CAKvcm2dpuftdtK6OdQv8fOfiw+4yQrPBQBHJ-FN2gDbT4P_oMQ@mail.gmail.com> <005b01ce798a$b0476600$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <op.wzrfpjyyyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <20130706131640.GG5246@cs.utwente.nl> <7D6B8CBB38964C9C82487F5D0F3648FC@FMVXD1232> <20130707203537.GA30691@cs.utwente.nl> <51DA00C8.6000600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DA0212.8020808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DA03CE.6020508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DA1680.6030602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DB6CB3.2080708@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <001601ce7c95$f235b360$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <51DBFF7D.9050807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DC58E9.5030005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DF1D06.8020208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51DF43E7.8080300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <op.wz4k19tayzqh0k@pc-roelof> <51E147E2.8080302@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <002701ce7ff5$714bc830$53e35890$@nifty.com> <51E1DDDF.3020904@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <op.wz7hsj1jyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <001501ce8098$51e6af20$f5b40d60$@nifty.com> <51E2B2D5.5090805@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <001c01ce80a7$03d1add0$0b750970$@nif! ty.com>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MF,

I just came back from a field experiment, using the short active dipole which is resonated to 475 kHz (4.7 mH and 10 mH fixed inductors in parallel plus a few pF (<10) for fine adjustment), with fiber optic cable.
Tests were done in JN49HK94RW, a distance of 2.3 km, see 
http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN49HK94RW&from=JN49IK00WD Since it 
was 17 AM local time i assume there was no skywave component. The 
location is an open field without trees or houses in a radius of at 
least 30m and without electricity in a radius of at least 100m.
Some results were interesting for me. However i have to do the test 
again because my own signal was so strong that some measurements 
overloaded the soundcard. I have to reduce the power by 30 dB or so in 
the next test, or i have to choose another location.
The signal levels were shown in my battery powered netbook using SpecLab 
Software. Noise measurements were done in 1 Hz NBW.
I do not have a high and stable plastic pole so it was just possible to 
do the test in 1.75 m above the ground. Tests were done in a horizontal 
and vertical position of the dipole. For the horizontal test i tried 
both, poiting of the dipole to the TX location and 90 deg rotated to it. 
There was no difference. The tests were done with a floating and a 
grounded dipole (grounded to a local earth rod, just 10cm into the soil).
Images:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/20130714_165114.jpg (Receiver) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/20130714_170616.jpg (Vertical) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/20130714_165421.jpg (Horizontal)
Results are attached in the image.

Now we can discuss about the results, or not :-)
As i said, i have to repeat the test because a few of the measurements were to close to the soundcards ADC limit and caused nonlinearity...
73, Stefan/DK7FC

Attachment: MFtest2.png
Description: PNG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>