Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: MiniWhip antenna, fiber optic

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: MiniWhip antenna, fiber optic
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 01:59:04 +0200
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAKvcm2dpuftdtK6OdQv8fOfiw+4yQrPBQBHJ-FN2gDbT4P_oMQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <op.wzq2tgvnyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <005b01ce798a$b0476600$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <op.wzrfpjyyyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <[email protected]> <7D6B8CBB38964C9C82487F5D0F3648FC@FMVXD1232> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi all,

OK, although it can't work (do you remember?!) i built an active antenna with battery supply and fiber optic output. The active part is a BF862. The circuit is quite simple: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/DK7FC_fiber%20optic%20active%20dipole%20schematic.jpg It is a first idea for the schematic. Maybe i will change it later so that the gate is shifted to 9V/2. Just for first experiments. In various tests with the BF862 i found that it was necessary to add a ferrite bead directly in front of the gate to prevent VHF oscillations of the JFET.

The TX is already working: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/DK7FC_fiber%20optic%20active%20dipole_TX.jpg
Yes yes yes, it is not truely symmetric and the capacity at source must be a bit larger than that of the leg connected to gate. Anyway it will be useful for some basic and interesting experiments.

RX is ready tomorrow.

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 07.07.2013 22:35, schrieb Pieter-Tjerk de Boer:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 06:01:17AM +0000, 間 幸久/JA5FP wrote:

  
So,it has no polarity and will be sensitive for E-field at its point.
    
It is physically impossible that an antenna has no polarization.

Let me explain why, by describing a thought-experiment.
Suppose you would have such an antenna which really has no polarization
at all.
Then put a transmitter some distance away from it. First let this
transmitter be vertically polarized, and next horizontally.
A non-polarized antenna should respond equally strongly in both cases,
so the only difference can be a difference of phase; measure this phase
difference.
Next, transmit both vertically and horizontally at the same time, with
a phase difference which is 180 degrees minus the difference that was
measured in the previous step.
The antenna's response to this must be the sum of the responses to the
separate signals, and due to how we chose the phase difference, these
responses will be equally large but opposite, so their sum is zero.
In other words, this _combination_ of horizontal and vertical polarization,
which can be a linear (diagonal) or circular polarization, is not
received by the antenna, contradicting the claim that it receives all
polarizations equally well.

B.t.w., this is also an argument why a miniwhip consisting of say a
metal sphere with an optical cable coming out of it, cannot work: the
antenna is completely synnetric and has nothing which could determine
its polarization, even though it must have one.

73, Pieter-Tjerk, PA3FWM


  
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>