Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna
From: edgar <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:58:44 +1000
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6

I sent this message two days ago and I did not see it arrive.

Although the subject is now out of context, I would like some comment on my question.

Regards, Edgar
Moonah, Tasmania.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:06:50 +1000
From: edgar <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]


Hi Pieter-Tjerk,

If that is the case, and all the parts are at the same potential, how 
does a space craft, radio controlled model aeroplane

get their signals?

Surely every conductor in the unit will have a difference in potential 
due to being in a electromagnetic field.

Even in the legs of the FET. Although the potential will be extremely small.

Surely it is only necessary to have a change of the Vgs voltage of the FET.

So the geometry of the antenna has to be made to allow this to occur.

Regards, Edgar
Moonah, Tasmania.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>