Alan
That is a valid suggestion. The thing that puzzles me is some of those that
redicule BS frequently are still reading and posting to the BS REFLECTOR.
It seems that all the hot stuff ie technical discussions about rigs and
antennas and topics like DX propagation and arrangements for skeds happen on
BS.
I am in direct contact with some DX stations about engaging in CW/QRSS QSO'S
both simplex and xband for those that cannot TX on LF/MF
When propagation permits I shall fire up like I did years ago in a
calculated manner and not Beacon wildly hoping for a chance strike.
I have worked many JA stations over the years on 160 metres and some of
these stations would like to work two way with EU on 500 Khz and they would
reply on the lower end of the 160 metre band CW. A couple of VK top band CW
dxers have expressed a similar interest.
I did hear a VK6 top band dxer on 24 Mhz this morning on CW
de G3KEV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: LF: test
> Hi Jay the problem being we dont have ready access to Blacksheep. I
suggest
> no-one cross posts messages they do not originate. This is the only polite
> way.
>
> I thought there was a mirror/archive of Blacksheep messages in the US....I
> remember seeing one about 10 years ago....but cant find it now so it must
> have died. It is easy enough to set up a Yahoo private group and have all
> the facilities that seem to be required....continuing with this Group in
the
> present conditions is just a hassle. I would have thought an "open" group
> would be a better way to encourage new LF stations. A poster can delete
> their own messages if they dont want them to persist. You can pull up all
> you posts and delete in one go. They may be cached for a while but will
soon
> "decay". You cannot "hide" an email address easily, though you may be able
> to use an anonymous site. I have no experience of that.
>
> Alan G3NYK
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 3:24 AM
> Subject: Re: LF: test
>
>
> > Alan
> >
> > Another possible solution ...
> >
> > Everyone on this list could indicate their preference ... 1) okay to
> > cross-post without permission, 2) okay to cross-post with permission or
3)
> > cross-posts never allowed. It would seem that this could be done with a
> > 'gentleman's agreement'. If not, anyone that cross-posts against the
> > desires of the originator will be subject to removal from this list.
> >
> > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 7:45 PM
> > Subject: Re: LF: test
> >
> >
> >> You can actually set up a private group on Yahoo where members only see
> >> the messages. I use these for a number of different committee. There is
> >> no access to messages outside the group members, and messages are not
> >> open to google style searches.In fact no one else knows the group
exists!
> >>
> >> Alan
> >> G3NYK
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]>
> >> To: <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 11:56 PM
> >> Subject: Re: LF: test
> >>
> >>
> >>> ...i am extremely irritated to see my emails and even my email adress
in
> >>> this reflector beeing permanently forwarded to the web, i.e. certain
> >>> public groups. Thus i consider to reduce my activity here and
> >>> communicate with the few really active people directly, at least for
> >>> some time.
> >>>
> >>> Stefan/DK7FC
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am 29.09.2012 21:34, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
> >>>> .. suspiciously quiet here on the reflector, especially for a weekend
> >>>> ..
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
|
