|
Markus
What ever Reflector is selected by the originator of a
posting it should remain there and not deliberately be reposted elswhere by
others.
At present I use BS and get all the information that I
require and DO NOT need any other relfector. If I decide Yahoo would be more
suitable for a posting then I would use it.
Have you noticed how many people despise BS but USE IT
!!!!!!!!!!
A better solution would be for all to get on with amateur
radio communications on their bands of interest and spend less time squabbling
about Reflectors and Internet. In the days before Reflectors and Internet there
was far more harmony amongst the radio amateur community. Information exchanges
took place on radio in QSO mode on a frequency of choice. Now exchanges take
place on Reflectors/Internet and frequencies especially LF/MF occupied by
Beacon generators.
G3KEV
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 8:11
AM
Subject: Re: LF: Forwarding or replying
to Yahoo
Hi Stefan,
I may have done the same. But honestly, I don't feel bad about it, as I
think there's nothing wrong in doing so.
Anyone can join the Blacksheep reflector. So I
would consider anything I post here as "said in public", open
to fair citation. If this is not your intent it would indeed be more
appropriate to revert to direct mail.
Personally I have no reservations about my
contributions appearing on "the web". To me, the
internet is not some kind of moloch but a very useful
means to share and retrieve information. In my opinion it's a
bit heretic to use Google every day, and at the same time complain about
contributing content to a searchable archive.
Regarding Yahoo and BS, I never found it
desirable to have two groups in parallel. And I don't think "opt out for crossposting" is a viable solution. Often
we have long (and sometimes valuable ;-) threads, from several different
contributers. When replying, would
you seriously expect us to search for anything that might have been
said by a person of the "no" group, and carefully cut it out? Again, citation
according to generally accepted rules should be freely
allowed.
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
PS it would be nice if we all would try to
care for valid subject lines, and replace those whenever a thread has
drifted away from the original topic.
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: LF: test
Stefan, I may have done
this. I have sometimes had
[email protected].
in the Cc field when I have replied to
an email. I sincerely apologize if
I've done something stupid to you. It
has never my intention. My goal has
been to inform , not to step on some
people. I am deeply
sorry
LA5VNA Steinar
loc:jo59jq
www.opera.no
Den 30.09.2012 00:56,
skrev Stefan Schäfer:
> ...i am extremely irritated to see my emails and
even my email adress
> in this reflector beeing permanently forwarded to
the web, i.e.
> certain public groups. Thus i consider to reduce my
activity here and
> communicate with the few really active people
directly, at least for
> some time.
>
>
Stefan/DK7FC
>
> Am 29.09.2012 21:34, schrieb
wolf_dl4yhf:
>> .. suspiciously quiet here on the reflector,
especially for a weekend ..
|
