Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 17:26:39 -0000
References: <[email protected]><000b01cd416c$9bef0a20$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><E48735667B22406A94125928F405A74E@IBM7FFA209F07C> <CAD+JcHT-12T-r=Vxrrr2dTMn3ZUtV8nE_B0XKF9vWXi=xZvBuw@mail.gmail.com> <00d501cd4198$727929b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <270B05A58E9F46F4AD21EFF298F32DE6@Shack> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Blacksheep was administered by Fair minded persons and organised in a democratic manner with freedom of _expression_.
From what G3XBM implied Yahoo membership would not be the case, one reason why he wanted the move. That is what he said, not my words. Cannot say I have heard you active on the LF/MF bands, silent operator.
 
g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 5:08 PM
Subject: LF: Re: O.T.: Reflector status

On 6/3/2012 6:56 PM, Tony wrote:
<snip>
Difficult members can be banned in exceptional circumstances.
<snip>
 
Can't the same be done also by the Blacksheep moderator (or administrator, if this term is more acceptable) ?
Censorship (or the lack of thereof) does not depend on the technical substrate, but just on the person who
has the authority to perform it.

73  Alberto  I2PHD

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>