Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:59:33 -0000
References: <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
You are not reading all the emails and yes he can reply but he seems to have gone Underground.
G3XBM pse respond and put Eddie in the picture
----- Original Message -----
From: g3zjo
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status

On 03/06/2012 15:52, mal hamilton wrote:
Well John
When you get G3XBM in a email/posting some time back indicating that a move to Yahoo would enable more control to ban persons like me whose opinions and point of view differ from his,  this is hardly encouraging or democratic.
A sysop is necessary to ensure smooth operation of any organised group but not CENSORSHIP or BANNING.

Come on Mal

I am sure Roger can stick up for himself but please don't resort to lies.

----- Original Message -----
From: John Gould
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status

Sorry guys, but I'm not monitoring this list much - rather busy on a number of other fronts.  However, as I have looked in to post the thing about the poll saw the comments below.  

What is this restriction Mal, on posting to Yahoo! Groups - can you elaborate as I am not aware of this.  

In answer to your comment Chris, I have said that I would arrange the Sysop to create a re-direct to the new group, so that people using the URL from one on the many published sources would be able to find the group.

I'm not trying to be difficult here, and really don't want to be saddled with monitoring and administering two groups on the same basic topic.

73 John, G3WKL

On 3 June 2012 12:04, Chris <[email protected]> wrote:
Mal, I agree.
Indeed, if the old site was to close I would suggest after a year or two at least. I first discovered it through the RSGB book 'LF Today' and probably many newcomers do the same. Also there are probably links to this site from others which will be around for years.
Vy 73 all,
Chris, G4AYT.
----- Original Message ----- From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 10:38 AM
Subject: LF: Re: O.T.: Reflector status

Keep Blacksheep reflector going as backup. I never had any serious problems
with it. It is perfectly functional and useful with small attachments and
for larger screen shots then Dropbox is suitable and has worked well this
has been pointed out by others.
I cannot see any advantage with the Yahoo reflector except I get more
adverts that I do not need.
Any mention of Underground LF/MF exploration are not permitted on Yahoo
de mal/g3kev

----- Original Message -----
From: "pws" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 8:37 AM
Subject: LF: O.T.: Reflector status

To John, G3WKL,

Please do NOT shut down this reflector.

1. It's active in positive sense.

2. There are too many hams here who say
"no thanks!" to that advertisement driven
Brave New World were each posting will be
"googleable" for ever. Me too.

That's the reason I unsubscribed from
some Yapoo-Groups recently.

73 Peter, df3lp

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG -
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5042 - Release Date: 06/03/12

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>