To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status |
From: | "manginbenoit.pro" <manginbenoit.pro@laposte.net> |
Date: | Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:13:43 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <4FCB4FAE.5070300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> |
References: | <4FCB225B.7020209@legal-medicine.de>, <4FCB47D9.9030800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <trinity-4811bd7f-44d3-43a9-96ed-80e1524d8447-1338723754505@3capp-webde-bs49.dlan.cinetic.de> <4FCB4FAE.5070300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
That's a thing of beauty Stefan ! So what is going on ? Is it only because a few people think this reflector is old-fashioned and want it QRT that it is bound to happen ? Is it : " I don't use, I destroy" ? If you don't want it, siply don't use it. But what is the point of seeing it disappear ? Is it a warlike sens of victory ? What is the matter with having another reflector still active ? Is it that somebody dislikes the perspective of not being the one and only ? What are those monopolistic fantasies ? Does'nt make sense to me. Although only qrv rx-wise for now, I really do not want to see this reflector fade away. de F8GRY/Ben > Message du 03/06/12 13:55 |
Previous by Date: | LF: BS Reflector status, Albert |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, Roger Lapthorn |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, Roger Lapthorn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |