| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status |
| From: | "manginbenoit.pro" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:13:43 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> <trinity-4811bd7f-44d3-43a9-96ed-80e1524d8447-1338723754505@3capp-webde-bs49.dlan.cinetic.de> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
That's a thing of beauty Stefan ! So what is going on ? Is it only because a few people think this reflector is old-fashioned and want it QRT that it is bound to happen ? Is it : " I don't use, I destroy" ? If you don't want it, siply don't use it. But what is the point of seeing it disappear ? Is it a warlike sens of victory ? What is the matter with having another reflector still active ? Is it that somebody dislikes the perspective of not being the one and only ? What are those monopolistic fantasies ? Does'nt make sense to me. Although only qrv rx-wise for now, I really do not want to see this reflector fade away. de F8GRY/Ben > Message du 03/06/12 13:55 |
| Previous by Date: | LF: BS Reflector status, Albert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, Roger Lapthorn |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, Stefan Schäfer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, Roger Lapthorn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |