LF: BS Reflector status

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: BS Reflector status
From:	Albert <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 03 Jun 2012 14:09:07 +0200
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1


All,

No pros and cons, just a few words from an OM. I know the Reflector isslow and some times has small problems but I am used to it and see nomajor reason for this sudden change.


73, Albert PA0A

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: O.T.: Reflector status, pws Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, DK8KW & DI2BO Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, M0FMT LF: Reflector status - junk-free...., Dave G3WCB. Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, pws LF: BS Reflector status, Albert <= Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, Gerhard Hickl LF: Re: O.T.: Reflector status, mal hamilton LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status, Chris Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status, John Gould Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status, mal hamilton Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status, Stewart Bryant Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status, g3zjo Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status, Tony Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status, mal hamilton Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status, g3zjo

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Date:	Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, manginbenoit.pro
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, pws
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, Gerhard Hickl
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]