Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status

["mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>]

Well done Tony. I like an impartial observer. Some nice persons on this group accusing others of being liars, still no need to ban them.

They do not know FACT from FICTION

Waiting for G3XBM to surface and clarify the position, he should have a say

g3kev

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Tony

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 4:56 PM

Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status

Umm, sorry Eddie ;-)

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Roger Lapthorn

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:51 PM

Subject: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE

 

<snip>

Difficult members can be banned in exceptional circumstances.

<snip>

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: g3zjo

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 4:42 PM

Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: O.T.: Reflector status

On 03/06/2012 15:52, mal hamilton wrote:

Well John

When you get G3XBM in a email/posting some time back indicating that a move to Yahoo would enable more control to ban persons like me whose opinions and point of view differ from his,  this is hardly encouraging or democratic.

A sysop is necessary to ensure smooth operation of any organised group but not CENSORSHIP or BANNING.

Come on Mal

I am sure Roger can stick up for himself but please don't resort to lies.

Eddie