Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE

["Chris" <c.ashby435@btinternet.com>]

This is EXACTLY why I say NO.
Chris, G4AYT.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steinar Aanesland" <saanes@broadpark.no>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE



hummm..an option to ban someone. I think I vote for yahoo too ;)

LA5VNA S


Den 24.05.2012 21:55, skrev Clemens Paul:
> >Do what you like but leave me OUT
> >G3KEV
>
> I vote for yahoo.)
>
> 73
> Clemens
> DL4RAJ
>
>
>
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: mal hamilton
>     To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>     Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:17 PM
>     Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
>     A moderator !!!!!!!!!!!!! or a censor !!!!!!!!!! and if you have
an opinion that differs from others you should be BANNED.
>     No discussion, no debate in other words a DICTORSHIP, hardly
democratic.
>     What next ???????????
>     I can manage without any of it and get on with amateur radio and
experimentation. These past few days without the reflector has not
hindered my amateur radio activities and I do not need to be vetted by
others !!
>     Do what you like but leave me OUT
>     G3KEV
>
>
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         From: Alberto di Bene
>         To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>         Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 5:17 PM
>         Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
>         On 5/24/2012 6:33 PM, g3zjo wrote:
> >         Why not go for it and start it yourself.
> >         We know some will not move so it will be an additional
facility. Please make sure it is has no taboo, f
> >         frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects rules, and no
childish sulking.
>         Another suggestion is to not make it an open group, meaning
that each request for membership should be
>         accompanied by a very short introductory message explaining
why that membership is requested.
>         Then the moderator(s) of the group will decide whether to
accept it or not.  I suppose the same is done
>         presently with the Majordomo mailer.
>
>         And, if that introductory message is convincing, but up to a
point... then the moderator can accept the individual,
>         but putting him in moderation status, meaning that every
message from him must be examined by the moderator(s)
>         before being published.  The moderation status can be removed
after a couple of legitimate messages from the guy,
>         showing that he is not a troll or spammer.
>
>         I use this method on my soft_radio  Yahoo group
>         http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/
>         with more than 2300 subscribers, and, if memory serves, I had
just a couple of cases where a spam message
>         got through in more than 8 years of the existence of that group.
>
>         73  Alberto  I2PHD
>
>     E-Mail ist virenfrei.
>     Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de
>     Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virendatenbank: 2425/5019 - Ausgabedatum:
24.05.2012
>