Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
From: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 14:39:52 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1338039590; bh=/tEYcdZRMjuBqhelnt8KaJ5loO6+A7hNERW+Fk5njv0=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=34xpgkHJ0F+FtKxVDAtc44cCkSeqAPrAwrL3X5inIg6QQS9RMdD6Egu1MOBByDKNIf8wilKgrsXm+xoLSKpddTpKhVIz485iWUUBKNd9fgTHyWm8BIPxAdXrue1cU+id/q05BtQx7l86UuSkkw49MLjkNJ7LChftGsorEa0OLEA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=Rumnk1ZARUjacKHoizkecwhSFmQb5sddYUwYi6o4oJyF8H6shOvRWt5WhN5CLERlmu5PQYDFcPYac85VlALqnVPa5q+PSqi1WwOxyIfc5TOwLPk3lGLR8wghdTDcoqQOqrapVayQc6xxwVz9/nNs3VYu8pUozx69gjZjJmTmNUY= ;
References: <CAHAQVWPELGnAZKqF3T7AaYo7pgd4GCTZO-L5iTCU3p3vYM+AEw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <006b01cd39e2$0b66efe0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <003601cd39e7$3be9d060$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

This is EXACTLY why I say NO.
Chris, G4AYT.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steinar Aanesland" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE



hummm..an option to ban someone. I think I vote for yahoo too ;)

LA5VNA S


Den 24.05.2012 21:55, skrev Clemens Paul:
>Do what you like but leave me OUT
>G3KEV

I vote for yahoo.)

73
Clemens
DL4RAJ




    ----- Original Message -----
    From: mal hamilton
    To: [email protected]
    Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:17 PM
    Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
    A moderator !!!!!!!!!!!!! or a censor !!!!!!!!!! and if you have
an opinion that differs from others you should be BANNED.
    No discussion, no debate in other words a DICTORSHIP, hardly
democratic.
    What next ???????????
    I can manage without any of it and get on with amateur radio and
experimentation. These past few days without the reflector has not
hindered my amateur radio activities and I do not need to be vetted by
others !!
    Do what you like but leave me OUT
    G3KEV


        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Alberto di Bene
        To: [email protected]
        Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 5:17 PM
        Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
        On 5/24/2012 6:33 PM, g3zjo wrote:
        Why not go for it and start it yourself.
        We know some will not move so it will be an additional
facility. Please make sure it is has no taboo, f
        frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects rules, and no
childish sulking.
        Another suggestion is to not make it an open group, meaning
that each request for membership should be
        accompanied by a very short introductory message explaining
why that membership is requested.
        Then the moderator(s) of the group will decide whether to
accept it or not.  I suppose the same is done
        presently with the Majordomo mailer.

        And, if that introductory message is convincing, but up to a
point... then the moderator can accept the individual,
        but putting him in moderation status, meaning that every
message from him must be examined by the moderator(s)
        before being published.  The moderation status can be removed
after a couple of legitimate messages from the guy,
        showing that he is not a troll or spammer.

        I use this method on my soft_radio  Yahoo group
        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/
        with more than 2300 subscribers, and, if memory serves, I had
just a couple of cases where a spam message
        got through in more than 8 years of the existence of that group.

        73  Alberto  I2PHD

    E-Mail ist virenfrei.
    Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de
    Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virendatenbank: 2425/5019 - Ausgabedatum:
24.05.2012






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>