Chris
He is kidding us, he reads every posting and RESPONDS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wonderful, he actually sees our point of view, Democracy is working.
g3kev
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steinar Aanesland" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
No big deal Chris. I have my own banning system.
People with negative attitude are going straight to my spam folder on
the mail server.
They will never reach my PC ;)
la5vna S
Den 26.05.2012 15:39, skrev Chris:
> This is EXACTLY why I say NO.
> Chris, G4AYT.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steinar Aanesland"
> <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 9:58 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
>
>
>
> hummm..an option to ban someone. I think I vote for yahoo too ;)
>
> LA5VNA S
>
>
> Den 24.05.2012 21:55, skrev Clemens Paul:
>> >Do what you like but leave me OUT
>> >G3KEV
>>
>> I vote for yahoo.)
>>
>> 73
>> Clemens
>> DL4RAJ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: mal hamilton
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:17 PM
>> Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
>> A moderator !!!!!!!!!!!!! or a censor !!!!!!!!!! and if you have
> an opinion that differs from others you should be BANNED.
>> No discussion, no debate in other words a DICTORSHIP, hardly
> democratic.
>> What next ???????????
>> I can manage without any of it and get on with amateur radio and
> experimentation. These past few days without the reflector has not
> hindered my amateur radio activities and I do not need to be vetted by
> others !!
>> Do what you like but leave me OUT
>> G3KEV
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Alberto di Bene
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 5:17 PM
>> Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead
>> .....PLEASE
>> On 5/24/2012 6:33 PM, g3zjo wrote:
>>> Why not go for it and start it yourself.
>>> We know some will not move so it will be an additional
> facility. Please make sure it is has no taboo, f
>>> frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects rules, and no
> childish sulking.
>> Another suggestion is to not make it an open group, meaning
> that each request for membership should be
>> accompanied by a very short introductory message explaining
> why that membership is requested.
>> Then the moderator(s) of the group will decide whether to
> accept it or not. I suppose the same is done
>> presently with the Majordomo mailer.
>>
>> And, if that introductory message is convincing, but up to a
> point... then the moderator can accept the individual,
>> but putting him in moderation status, meaning that every
> message from him must be examined by the moderator(s)
>> before being published. The moderation status can be removed
> after a couple of legitimate messages from the guy,
>> showing that he is not a troll or spammer.
>>
>> I use this method on my soft_radio Yahoo group
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/
>> with more than 2300 subscribers, and, if memory serves, I had
> just a couple of cases where a spam message
>> got through in more than 8 years of the existence of that group.
>>
>> 73 Alberto I2PHD
>>
>> E-Mail ist virenfrei.
>> Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de
>> Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virendatenbank: 2425/5019 - Ausgabedatum:
> 24.05.2012
>>
>
>
>
>
>
|
