Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 19:29:39 -0000
References: <CAHAQVWPELGnAZKqF3T7AaYo7pgd4GCTZO-L5iTCU3p3vYM+AEw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <006b01cd39e2$0b66efe0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <003601cd39e7$3be9d060$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <[email protected]> <AA18D8FF85D04DFEA0C61B41912B650E@IBM7FFA209F07C> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
I wonder if I am on the HIT list

de G3KEV the Station for Information and Education

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steinar Aanesland" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE



No big deal Chris. I have my own banning system.
People with negative attitude are going straight to my spam folder on
the mail server.
They will never reach my PC ;)

la5vna S


Den 26.05.2012 15:39, skrev Chris:
> This is EXACTLY why I say NO.
> Chris, G4AYT.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steinar Aanesland"
> <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 9:58 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
>
>
>
> hummm..an option to ban someone. I think I vote for yahoo too ;)
>
> LA5VNA S
>
>
> Den 24.05.2012 21:55, skrev Clemens Paul:
>> >Do what you like but leave me OUT
>> >G3KEV
>>
>> I vote for yahoo.)
>>
>> 73
>> Clemens
>> DL4RAJ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     ----- Original Message -----
>>     From: mal hamilton
>>     To: [email protected]
>>     Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:17 PM
>>     Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
>>     A moderator !!!!!!!!!!!!! or a censor !!!!!!!!!! and if you have
> an opinion that differs from others you should be BANNED.
>>     No discussion, no debate in other words a DICTORSHIP, hardly
> democratic.
>>     What next ???????????
>>     I can manage without any of it and get on with amateur radio and
> experimentation. These past few days without the reflector has not
> hindered my amateur radio activities and I do not need to be vetted by
> others !!
>>     Do what you like but leave me OUT
>>     G3KEV
>>
>>
>>         ----- Original Message -----
>>         From: Alberto di Bene
>>         To: [email protected]
>>         Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 5:17 PM
>>         Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead
>> .....PLEASE
>>         On 5/24/2012 6:33 PM, g3zjo wrote:
>>>         Why not go for it and start it yourself.
>>>         We know some will not move so it will be an additional
> facility. Please make sure it is has no taboo, f
>>>         frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects rules, and no
> childish sulking.
>>         Another suggestion is to not make it an open group, meaning
> that each request for membership should be
>>         accompanied by a very short introductory message explaining
> why that membership is requested.
>>         Then the moderator(s) of the group will decide whether to
> accept it or not.  I suppose the same is done
>>         presently with the Majordomo mailer.
>>
>>         And, if that introductory message is convincing, but up to a
> point... then the moderator can accept the individual,
>>         but putting him in moderation status, meaning that every
> message from him must be examined by the moderator(s)
>>         before being published.  The moderation status can be removed
> after a couple of legitimate messages from the guy,
>>         showing that he is not a troll or spammer.
>>
>>         I use this method on my soft_radio  Yahoo group
>>         http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/
>>         with more than 2300 subscribers, and, if memory serves, I had
> just a couple of cases where a spam message
>>         got through in more than 8 years of the existence of that group.
>>
>>         73  Alberto  I2PHD
>>
>>     E-Mail ist virenfrei.
>>     Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de
>>     Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virendatenbank: 2425/5019 - Ausgabedatum:
> 24.05.2012
>>
>
>
>
>
>






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>