As expected, there are views for and against, but I think more would now favour a move than not.
A decision would need to be taken by whoever runs the current blacksheep reflector. As said earlier, setting up a Yahoo group would take minutes, but this is definitely something to be done by the current LF-reflector owner (or not if decided against).
I suspect those against don't understand how current well run Yahoo groups work. They really work very well indeed and honestly would be an extremely helpful resource for this community.
73s Roger G3XBM
-- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver --
Of course, there already is a yahoo group
for 136 Band users , open to all to Join in :
)
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
NOT
I vote for a active LF band! Amateur radio on 137
kHz! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 24.05.2012 21:55, schrieb Clemens
Paul:
>Do what you like but leave me OUT
>G3KEV
I vote for yahoo.)
73
Clemens
DL4RAJ
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:17 PM
Subject:
Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
A moderator !!!!!!!!!!!!! or a censor !!!!!!!!!! and
if you have an opinion that differs from others you should be
BANNED.
No discussion, no debate in other words a DICTORSHIP,
hardly democratic.
What next ???????????
I can manage without any of it and get on with amateur
radio and experimentation. These past few days without the reflector has not
hindered my amateur radio activities and I do not need to be vetted by
others !!
Do what you like but leave me OUT
G3KEV
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Thursday, May 24, 2012 5:17 PM
Subject:
Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
On 5/24/2012 6:33 PM, g3zjo wrote:
Why
not go for it and start it yourself.
We know some will not move so it
will be an additional facility. Please make sure it is has no taboo,
f
frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects rules, and no childish
sulking. Another suggestion is to not make it an open
group, meaning that each request for membership should be
accompanied
by a very short introductory message explaining why that membership is
requested.
Then the moderator(s) of the group will decide whether to
accept it or not. I suppose the same is done
presently with the
Majordomo mailer.
And, if that introductory message is convincing,
but up to a point... then the moderator can accept the individual,
but
putting him in moderation status, meaning that every message from him must
be examined by the moderator(s)
before being published. The
moderation status can be removed after a couple of legitimate messages
from the guy,
showing that he is not a troll or spammer.
I use
this method on my soft_radio Yahoo group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/
with
more than 2300 subscribers, and, if memory serves, I had just a couple of
cases where a spam message
got through in more than 8 years of the
existence of that group.
73 Alberto
I2PHD
E-Mail ist virenfrei.
Von AVG
überprüft - www.avg.de
Version: 2012.0.2176 /
Virendatenbank: 2425/5019 - Ausgabedatum: 24.05.2012
|
