Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE NOT

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE NOT
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 23:03:42 +0200
In-reply-to: <003601cd39e7$3be9d060$1502a8c0@Clemens04>
References: <CAHAQVWPELGnAZKqF3T7AaYo7pgd4GCTZO-L5iTCU3p3vYM+AEw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <006b01cd39e2$0b66efe0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <003601cd39e7$3be9d060$1502a8c0@Clemens04>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
I vote for a active LF band!
Amateur radio on 137 kHz!

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 24.05.2012 21:55, schrieb Clemens Paul:
>Do what you like but leave me OUT
>G3KEV
 
I vote for yahoo.)
 
73
Clemens
DL4RAJ
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE

A moderator !!!!!!!!!!!!! or a censor !!!!!!!!!! and if you have an opinion that differs from others you should be BANNED.
No discussion, no debate in other words a DICTORSHIP, hardly democratic.
What next ???????????
I can manage without any of it and get on with amateur radio and experimentation. These past few days without the reflector has not hindered my amateur radio activities and I do not need to be vetted by others !!
Do what you like but leave me OUT
G3KEV
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE

On 5/24/2012 6:33 PM, g3zjo wrote:
Why not go for it and start it yourself.
We know some will not move so it will be an additional facility. Please make sure it is has no taboo, f
frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects rules, and no childish sulking.
Another suggestion is to not make it an open group, meaning that each request for membership should be
accompanied by a very short introductory message explaining why that membership is requested.
Then the moderator(s) of the group will decide whether to accept it or not.  I suppose the same is done
presently with the Majordomo mailer.

And, if that introductory message is convincing, but up to a point... then the moderator can accept the individual,
but putting him in moderation status, meaning that every message from him must be examined by the moderator(s)
before being published.  The moderation status can be removed after a couple of legitimate messages from the guy,
showing that he is not a troll or spammer.

I use this method on my soft_radio  Yahoo group  
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/
with more than 2300 subscribers, and, if memory serves, I had just a couple of cases where a spam message
got through in more than 8 years of the existence of that group.

73  Alberto  I2PHD

E-Mail ist virenfrei.
Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de
Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virendatenbank: 2425/5019 - Ausgabedatum: 24.05.2012

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>