Therein lies the answer for AVOIDING a Yahoo group. If you do not like
another persons point of View, Ban them, Flog them, Burn them at the stake
!!
and certainly a SENSE OF HUMOUR is out.
Democratic ------- I do not think so
mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steinar Aanesland" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
hummm..an option to ban someone. I think I vote for yahoo too ;)
LA5VNA S
Den 24.05.2012 21:55, skrev Clemens Paul:
> >Do what you like but leave me OUT
> >G3KEV
>
> I vote for yahoo.)
>
> 73
> Clemens
> DL4RAJ
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: mal hamilton
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:17 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
> A moderator !!!!!!!!!!!!! or a censor !!!!!!!!!! and if you have
an opinion that differs from others you should be BANNED.
> No discussion, no debate in other words a DICTORSHIP, hardly
democratic.
> What next ???????????
> I can manage without any of it and get on with amateur radio and
experimentation. These past few days without the reflector has not
hindered my amateur radio activities and I do not need to be vetted by
others !!
> Do what you like but leave me OUT
> G3KEV
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alberto di Bene
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 5:17 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
> On 5/24/2012 6:33 PM, g3zjo wrote:
>> Why not go for it and start it yourself.
>> We know some will not move so it will be an additional
facility. Please make sure it is has no taboo, f
>> frequencies, modes, opinions, or subjects rules, and no
childish sulking.
> Another suggestion is to not make it an open group, meaning
that each request for membership should be
> accompanied by a very short introductory message explaining
why that membership is requested.
> Then the moderator(s) of the group will decide whether to
accept it or not. I suppose the same is done
> presently with the Majordomo mailer.
>
> And, if that introductory message is convincing, but up to a
point... then the moderator can accept the individual,
> but putting him in moderation status, meaning that every
message from him must be examined by the moderator(s)
> before being published. The moderation status can be removed
after a couple of legitimate messages from the guy,
> showing that he is not a troll or spammer.
>
> I use this method on my soft_radio Yahoo group
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/
> with more than 2300 subscribers, and, if memory serves, I had
just a couple of cases where a spam message
> got through in more than 8 years of the existence of that group.
>
> 73 Alberto I2PHD
>
> E-Mail ist virenfrei.
> Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de
> Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virendatenbank: 2425/5019 - Ausgabedatum:
24.05.2012
>
|
