To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: QRM 498-502 kHz |
From: | "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:47:10 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <20101005214122.35319e66@opc1> |
References: | <507BA536922744A492A0688F07B4851F@Inspiron> <6CE5F9E1C58945C49E23494A9B755CE3@AGB> <B96C7E61B3264E81BC6B04CED43DAF29@AGB> <20101005211707.34f8e8be@opc1> <20101005214122.35319e66@opc1> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Opera Mail/10.62 (Win32) |
Op Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:41:22 +0200 schreef John P-G <[email protected]>: On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 21:17:07 +0100 John P-G <[email protected]> wrote:It seems strange that I can't hear it but that might help rule in/out a possible location? I'll keep looking.I spoke too soon! I think I can see it on a waterfall now, but using a passive wire antenna. Whether the ALA1530 loop has a low enough noise floor to use it to DF is a moot point. I'll keep an eye on things see if I can get something to get a bearing on. In the meantime I've set up SpecLab to save a grab every 5 minutes to my public Dropbox folder, here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3551430/gm4slv.jpg The grabber covers 497.6 - 499.2 which shows the LF edge of the noise at 498kHz. I might have to think about a Perseus now, to look at wider areas. An SSB bandwidth suddenly looks so limited! Cheers, John --Gemaakt met Opera's revolutionaire e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: QRM 498-502 kHz, John P-G |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: QRM 498-502 kHz, Roelof Bakker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: QRM 498-502 kHz, John P-G |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: QRM 498-502 kHz, Roelof Bakker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |