To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: LF: QRM 498-502 kHz |
From: | "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:38:51 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1286318335; bh=mTIU/jlRInM5bbDQok1ZaAG4m/Tu4b1GVtsGWDdvWNU=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Importance:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE; b=XZO4dMgD1PHd3GMqvGnQ/5Ym6Z+J8/Hj3EV7yJLiNCTu7UTB8O0tdY8BKx0ENq6IUsrfYEYT1eNUQQLLxtiWlI+gcPKFlpYJEKwC26PXRwQyDn7pOO0c4Ql6WjpHZUFFNK9uZuv+djAS6uuSOdoCtlkPDaqzpF/fz+sdPX2oL0s= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Importance:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE; b=2auwg+FzLle0tqKb7651O1tW6yvH0+yNfdPeFyghfL+BMAaPhoPIxWDIDgCdJD6ODusF+5BwU8ejf4rnQQa4rl+yWkndTCgG+NWBDzvD0vBOy9zV4aXZXc0EbNh4VJskIpn9nIS1zJxF2ui3cE+2dBLMzx91HWt0w/nwA9owzhs= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <20101005214122.35319e66@opc1> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | Actkzfh52xajInAGQWGaupXtCmy0KgADkyIg |
Hi John, Roelof, Graham, and all, Set up the grabber here so you can see the signal I refer. Notably it doesn't seem as strong as yesterday and with considerably more QSB. http://www.m0lmh.co.uk/grabs/600m.jpg Will leave it running for a few hours yet. As Graham mentioned, it does make monitoring the 501100 WSPR slot rather patchy. Maybe I should make a DF loop for such quandries. 73, Lee M0LMH. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: Re: DK7FC's 7th VLF kite experiment, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: Inspire VLF-3 receiver, Daniele Tincani |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: QRM 498-502 kHz, Roelof Bakker |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: QRM 498-502 kHz, John P-G |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |