There are no official differences in procedure, but of course most
stations would try to send less information and shorter 'words'
during slower QRSS QSOs. "73" could be replaced by "GB" (goodbye),
and once full callsigns have been exchanged, they could be shortened
of left out completely. Reports need not be repeated (just 'O'
instead of 'O O O'). This is most important when using QRSS30 or
QRSS60 for intercontinental QSOs. A useful timing advantage comes
from using DFCW though it is slightly less readable than QRSS.
Mike, G3XDV
==========
> Is there a special procedure to shorten QSO's in QRSS10 or are there
> short signs? Couldn't we use letters in stead of numbers in our calls?
> Or just a 3 for 73 to give an example? 3 HBNASB
>
> 2009/12/13 Mike Dennison <[email protected]>
>
> > See my web page:
> >
> > http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mike.dennison/index/lf/gallery/dl3zid.h
> > tm
> >
> > for an illustration of the difference between QRSS3 and QRSS10 on a
> > marginal signal.
> >
> > Mike, G3XDV
> > ==========
> >
> > > Does anybody know about the "gain" between QRSS3 and QRSS10 or
> > > QRSS30? I mean, if the noise in both cases is equal, how much can
> > > I reduce my tx pwr when switching from qrss3 to qrss10? Or isn't
> > > it possible to give such a relation? And: Was there ever a TA QSO
> > > in QRSS3? I am new on the reflector, sri ;-)
> > >
> > > Stefan / DK7FC
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
|
