Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?
From:	Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:00:34 +0100
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=86J7uUJVTQE1RvCxZH9EaXx2pmX3K1l/VQlrzWVuzB8=; b=lUtGm2DZGKCPGUeN+Jd9j/GpqZGmK3VPG8BWKyn6HkU8GL+b6SjfUeKu2ztug7xsNn iFJfUNQ1zDokxDJhkcPSQgsQUu0KGCLGAS6uxjXLTR6Q16mO8ypBSytrXvWBXF8pooiz BTseEEaEQXdd2feitn/GzNrIMFloRtDLLAeqg=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hd8JxFsSoLObdxDUAuRJ+gyDPHhUFVPbsBsG34Ff4Kie8B35MFGxoPZ5qYkxa+Lpqy aoqfakNG4zgTnYfRMZqhEdC129gGz7Rv2WTgV6LlrmxDS92VH5rdarCkms3c5X8GQaR+ z2inTKijms3hjjVKurv9r1AoS09aaZs6l4NOE=
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<1260444821.6353.65.camel@vaio3rd> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AC12@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hello Mike
Is there a special procedure to shorten QSO's in QRSS10 or are there short signs?
Couldn't we use letters in stead of numbers in our calls?
Or just a 3 for 73 to give an example?
3 HBNASB

2009/12/13 Mike Dennison <[email protected]>

See my web page:

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mike.dennison/index/lf/gallery/dl3zid.htm

for an illustration of the difference between QRSS3 and QRSS10 on a
marginal signal.

Mike, G3XDV
==========

> Does anybody know about the "gain" between QRSS3 and QRSS10 or QRSS30?
> I mean, if the noise in both cases is equal, how much can I reduce my
> tx pwr when switching from qrss3 to qrss10? Or isn't it possible to
> give such a relation? And: Was there ever a TA QSO in QRSS3? I am new
> on the reflector, sri ;-)
>
> Stefan / DK7FC
>
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: LF: oe5odl in BY, (continued) Re: LF: oe5odl in BY, Oberreiter Oswald LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Johan H. Bodin AW: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Stefan Schäfer Re: AW: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Johan H. Bodin Re: AW: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, ALAN MELIA Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Andy Talbot Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, mal hamilton Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Andy Talbot Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Mike Dennison Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Anton Bärtschi <= Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Mike Dennison AW: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Stefan Schäfer Re: AW: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Mike Dennison Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Andy Talbot Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, mal hamilton Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Roelof Bakker LF: Max power was qrss 3/10, hellozerohellozero Re: AW: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Rik Strobbe AW: AW: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Stefan Schäfer Re: AW: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, mal hamilton

Previous by Date:	LF: "Y" beacon on 137.777, Marco IK1ODO
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Re: IK1HSS WSPR, Marco IK1ODO
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Mike Dennison
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Mike Dennison
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]