Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: IK1HSS WSPR

from [Marco IK1ODO] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: IK1HSS WSPR
From: Marco IK1ODO <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:59:54 +0100
In-reply-to: <007b01ca7c0c$167e7b00$0201a8c0@Clemens04>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <6E7638745A1B43168C402CDBB010C2A7@AGB> <[email protected]> <007b01ca7c0c$167e7b00$0201a8c0@Clemens04>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected] 

At 16.50 13/12/2009, you wrote:

Are you sure abt the frequencies?
I think with "carrier" you mean the dial qrg,i.e. 136.420.
If so, 137.740 is 80Hz below the wspr band.

73
Clemens
DL4RAJ


Hello Clemens,

the WSPR signal frequency is now 137.751 +/- 2 Hz - the dial should be 136.250
I hate this "dial" way of specifying QRG :-) - Marco IK1HSS's signal is on 137.751 for me.
Is there a WSPR recommended sub-band? If I add 80 Hz to 137.740 I end out of the band ... 

73 - Marco IK1ODO
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Anton Bärtschi
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Re: IK1HSS WSPR, Clemens Paul
Previous by Thread:  LF: Re: IK1HSS WSPR, Clemens Paul
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: IK1HSS WSPR, Clemens Paul
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]