Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10? |
| From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:08:16 +0000 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=K4kBWSLEjMXWd+wMyFjiStxPlpaw96hyI8vFYc1Lhps=; b=UMH0QNuQaDG56puMX8KMkC+mjgYMRaypV7/e3FF3hDw/uXJqIdzCOsox0YS2rz5awr 5KC24xpJoy5+Sr7SRojlqu8v9troy6prv7Oz/UmZcQBh6uX5QYZfCkv60ec9JaAIN+Zs zOtrHVdwVVrHKtsS+ii3AGupojDDH7Yuxi88Y= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bFKdQpfNHNDJMhjDSl1wJ3fOQpan5RWMcoy0Y85cxIJjZz3xoCfbH5Nt8GNB/TddMt /kpLjk/JxXaKNbuL/gH/i4cD0EjfCXm83R7zleLgajZfOKsJjOUjalriVhbq5hBFPk4c 8f6wY+R2h0ezGiGfNGttIxdLIOWeFhUhu99Sk= |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| In-reply-to: | <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AC12@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
| References: | <1260444821.6353.65.camel@vaio3rd> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AC12@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
10.LOG(10/3) = 5dB and 10.LOG(30/3) = 10dB Andy www.g4jnt.com This email has been scanned for damaging side-effects by the health and safety police 2009/12/11 Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>: > Dear LF, > Does anybody know about the "gain" between QRSS3 and QRSS10 or QRSS30? I > mean, if the noise in both cases is equal, how much can I reduce my tx pwr > when switching from qrss3 to qrss10? Or isn't it possible to give such a > relation? > And: Was there ever a TA QSO in QRSS3? > I am new on the reflector, sri ;-) > > Stefan / DK7FC > > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Johan H. Bodin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | AW: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Stefan Schäfer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, mal hamilton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Mike Dennison |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |