Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?

from [Mike Dennison] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?
From: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:49:22 -0000
In-reply-to: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AC12@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de>
References: <1260444821.6353.65.camel@vaio3rd>, <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AC12@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected] 
See my web page:

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mike.dennison/index/lf/gallery/dl3zid.htm

for an illustration of the difference between QRSS3 and QRSS10 on a 
marginal signal.

Mike, G3XDV
==========

> Does anybody know about the "gain" between QRSS3 and QRSS10 or QRSS30?
> I mean, if the noise in both cases is equal, how much can I reduce my
> tx pwr when switching from qrss3 to qrss10? Or isn't it possible to
> give such a relation? And: Was there ever a TA QSO in QRSS3? I am new
> on the reflector, sri ;-)
> 
> Stefan / DK7FC
> 
>
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: IK1HSS WSPR, Marco IK1ODO
Next by Date:  Re: LF: IK1HSS WSPR, John RABSON
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Andy Talbot
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?, Anton Bärtschi
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]