Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: LF Receiver

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: LF Receiver
From: "K2ORS" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:48:16 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Laurie,
 
   From among my own receivers, I find that the Cubic 3280 is a very good DSP receiver AND you can shut the AGC off.
For non-DSP, the newer RACALs such as the 6830 work great and have switchable AGC.
An SLM such as the 3586 is a good choice if all you don't need an AM detector.
 
I agree with the comments on the R75 and AOR 7030- but both benefit from adding the cw filters.
 
If price is no object QST claims that the Icom R-9500 is one of the best ever in terms of strong signal handling (though I can't confirm this from personal experience yet).
 
73 Warren K2ORS
 
 
----- Original Message -----
To: rsgb
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 1:45 PM
Subject: LF: LF Receiver

I have for a long time used a Racal 1792 reciever for QRSS modes on LF.
This receiver failed recently,and I have been looking for a replacement receiver.
This search reveals a problem most modern receivers use DSP techniques
for filtering and the AGC is derived from the filtered signal. None of the receivers
I have looked at have an AGC OFF  facility.This means that if one of these receivers
is used with ARGO or similar FFT programs a strong signal within the pass band
will desensitise the Rx. It seems quite possible that a weak signal could quite
disapear. It also appears that some AGC is applied before the digital filter so that
signals within the roofing filters bandwith will also produce de-sensitisation, and this
could be as much as 15kHz away from the tune freq.
Any ideas on receivers not using DSP filtering ?
Or do I look for another R1792   

73 Laurie G3AQC
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>