Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: QSO format |
| From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:30:06 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <001d01c2a633$d31d7060$0700000a@parissn2> |
| References: | <000b01c2a4ff$bc781fc0$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <000601c2a50e$0b89ca60$4d6a0450@oemcomputer> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Dear Stewart, LF Group, At 02:21 18/12/2002 +0100, you wrote: A simple experimental test that could be easily done would be to compare the signals from HBG on 75kHz and DCF77 on 77.5kHz - both these signals would fit into the bandwidth of an SSB filter, and could be simultaneously monitored using Spectrum Lab.There will occasionally be huge phase discrepancies, when one signal is nearly canceled because two effective paths are roughly 180 degrees apart. But I believe that there would be good correlation most of the time. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Signal report, Kölpin Thomas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Steve's DCF data plotted, Alan Melia |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Stewart Nelson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: QSO format, Ed Lesnichy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |