To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: QSO format |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Mon, 16 Dec 2002 08:22:50 EST |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Laurie, John et al, Since I'm not directly involved, I should probably keep my mouth shut, but from experience in other forms of weak-signal work I might suggest reserving "R" for "Roger" and just sending the signal report, whether "O", "5" or whatever. If the receiving station would like the report repeated, how about "?" rather than "R?" 73, Ray, W2RS |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Measuring earth resistance, Dick Rollema |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: QSO format, John Andrews |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: QSO format, Ed Lesnichy |
Next by Thread: | RE: LF: QSO format, Andy talbot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |