Re: LF: Re: QSO format

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: QSO format

from [Mike Dennison]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Re: QSO format
From:	"Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:19:37 -0000
References:	<000b01c2a4ff$bc781fc0$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <000601c2a50e$0b89ca60$4d6a0450@oemcomputer> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

> On a general point about QRSS procedures, I still see 'TNX' or 'TKS'

being

> sent, 'TU' is much shorter. Also do we need to send the very long '73'?

The "TKS" and "73" is sent by W4DEX on 40m; I guess that will be in normal
speed and not QRSS ? :)

73, Fabian dj1yfk


Yes, but I was talking about ordinary EU QRSS3 QSOs. Perhaps I should have
put that in a separate e-mail.

Mike, G3XDV
http://www.lf.thersgb.net
====================

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: QSO format, Laurie Mayhead LF: Re: QSO format, John Andrews LF: Re: QSO format, Mike Dennison Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Steve Thompson Re: LF: Re: QSO format, John Andrews Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Fabian Kurz Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Mike Dennison <= Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Stewart Nelson Re: LF: Re: QSO format, James Moritz Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Stewart Nelson Re: LF: Re: QSO format, James Moritz Re: LF: QSO format, Ed Lesnichy Re: LF: QSO format, RaySoifer RE: LF: QSO format, Andy talbot Re: LF: QSO format, Stewart Bryant Re: LF: QSO format, RaySoifer Re[2]: LF: QSO format, Ed Lesnichy

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Re: Measuring earth resistance, Dick Rollema
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Re: Measuring earth resistance, James Moritz
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Fabian Kurz
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Stewart Nelson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]