Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: QSO format

To: "Laurie Mayhead" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: QSO format
From: "Ed Lesnichy" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:57:43 +0300
In-reply-to: <000b01c2a4ff$bc781fc0$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2>
Organization: Ed Lesnichy
References: <000b01c2a4ff$bc781fc0$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Hello LF-fans!

I like the following algorithm more:

QRSS - QRSS
------------
1) CQ G3AQC K
2) G3AQC RU6LA K
3) RU6LA O AQC K   (or RU6LA O G3AQC K if no correct G3AQC call)
4) AQC O RO ("Roger O") LA K   (or AQC OR LA K ??)
5) LA RO AQC SK    (or better LA R AQC EE ??)
6) LA SK (or LA EE ??)

QRSS - CW (X-band also)
-----------------------
The CW-station will carry out traditional CW-CW QSO,
but the report gives O, M or T
1) CQ G3AQC K
2).......
3) RU6LA S7 ("Strength 7") AQC K
4).......
5)LA RO AQC SK  (or LA R AQC EE ??)
6).......
(I had a some QSOs with UA and all have understood, that I have
given them RST 579 ;-))

Can be on very slow QRSS (30-120s dot and on sked):
---------------------------------------------------
1) G3AQC K
2) AQC RU6LA K (in CW - traditional)
3) LA O K (in CW - LA S7 K)
4) AQC OR("Report O" & "Roger Report") K  (in CW traditional)
5) LA R EE
6) LA EE

I believe, that "Readability" it is better to not use
(R  - "Readability" or "Roger"??)

73! Ed  RU6LA  [email protected]



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>