Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: QSO format |
| From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:20:07 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <004901c2a533$ab9fd8d0$0700000a@parissn2> |
| References: | <000b01c2a4ff$bc781fc0$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <000601c2a50e$0b89ca60$4d6a0450@oemcomputer> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Dear Stewart, LF Group, At 19:48 16/12/2002 +0100, you wrote: However, I believe that HBG 75 could serve as a "pilot" carrier. In order to serve as a pilot carrier in this way, the signal from HBG would have to be subject to exactly the same propagation effects and noise levels as G3AQC - but since these two stations are operating in different locations, on different frequencies, is it likely that this is actually the case? Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: EARTH RESISTANCE, Dave Pick |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: EARTH RESISTANCE, g6tmk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Stewart Nelson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Stewart Nelson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |