Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected], "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: QSO format |
| From: | "Steve Thompson" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:03:50 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <000601c2a50e$0b89ca60$4d6a0450@oemcomputer> |
| References: | <000b01c2a4ff$bc781fc0$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <000601c2a50e$0b89ca60$4d6a0450@oemcomputer> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 16 December 2002 14:18, Mike Dennison wrote: Or the very long 'CQ'? Maybe it's time for a new set of abbreviations to go with the mode.snip On a general point about QRSS procedures, I still see 'TNX' or 'TKS' being sent, 'TU' is much shorter. Also do we need to send the very long '73'? Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: QSO format, Mike Dennison |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: QSO format, RaySoifer |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: QSO format, Mike Dennison |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: QSO format, John Andrews |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |