Re: LF: Re: QSO format

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Re: QSO format
From:	"Fabian Kurz" <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:46:35 +0000
References:	<000b01c2a4ff$bc781fc0$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <000601c2a50e$0b89ca60$4d6a0450@oemcomputer>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>


On a general point about QRSS procedures, I still see 'TNX' or 'TKS' being
sent, 'TU' is much shorter. Also do we need to send the very long '73'?


The "TKS" and "73" is sent by W4DEX on 40m; I guess that will be in normal
speed and not QRSS ? :)

73, Fabian dj1yfk

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: QSO format, Laurie Mayhead LF: Re: QSO format, John Andrews LF: Re: QSO format, Mike Dennison Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Steve Thompson Re: LF: Re: QSO format, John Andrews Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Fabian Kurz <= Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Mike Dennison Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Stewart Nelson Re: LF: Re: QSO format, James Moritz Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Stewart Nelson Re: LF: Re: QSO format, James Moritz Re: LF: QSO format, Ed Lesnichy Re: LF: QSO format, RaySoifer RE: LF: QSO format, Andy talbot Re: LF: QSO format, Stewart Bryant Re: LF: QSO format, RaySoifer

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: QSO format, Stewart Bryant
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Re: Measuring earth resistance, Dick Rollema
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: QSO format, John Andrews
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: QSO format, Mike Dennison
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]